Resolve "Add integration in Alsijil" #23
No reviewers
Labels
No labels
Security
TeX
auto-update
check
delete-eslint-rc-js
check
update-builddeps-package-json
check
update-eslint-rc-js
check
update-gitignore
check
update-merge-request-template
check
update-prettier-ignore
check
update-pyproject-toml
check
update-renovate-json
check
update-tox-ini
part
backend
part
ci
part
docs
part
frontend
part
i18n
part
non-technical
part
packaging
prio
1
prio
2
prio
3
release-mr-5.x
size
large
size
medium
size
small
source
customer
source
customer::fsmw
source
customer::fss
source
customer::teckids
source
downstream
type
bug
type
feature
type
refactoring
workflow
blocked
workflow
confirmed
workflow
current-todo
workflow
discussing
workflow
new-app
workflow
wontfix
No milestone
No project
No assignees
1 participant
Notifications
Due date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set.
Reference
aleksis/AlekSIS-App-Stoelindeling!23
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue
No description provided.
Delete branch "2-add-integration-in-alsijil"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
Closes #2
added 3 commits
d479a3cd- Add missing migration412153bf- Add intergration of seating plans7c1ecce6- Fix permissionsCompare with previous version
Related: https://edugit.org/AlekSIS/official/AlekSIS-App-Alsijil/-/merge_requests/278
marked this merge request as ready
assigned to @nik
added 1h of time spent
added 1 commit
e72d5a40- Fix migration depCompare with previous version
I am not convinced this can be considered "readable".
Can this be re-arranged to not have so many conditionals chained, let alone several
if subjectblocks?Missing doc string.
Missing doc string.
added 3 commits
master34a4354f- Merge branch 'master' into 2-add-integration-in-alsijilCompare with previous version
added 2 commits
a977b64b- Fix some permissions for use in Alsijild423655f- Reduce menu as there is just one menu itemCompare with previous version
added 1 commit
Compare with previous version
requested review from @magicfelix
Using an admin account I created a seating plan (regular teachers don't have the necessary permission) for group 2b, subject D.
On the Alsijil page for such a lesson (2b, D) it says "There is no seating plan for this lesson.".
This problem probably occurs, because we don't have rooms for our lesson periods.
Do we want to support this use case and fix it in AlekSIS or is a lesson period required to have a room assigned?
added 4 commits
5bae62cf- Fix permission names8fa12ebc- Fix some permissions for use in Alsijilef670485- Reduce menu as there is just one menu item472eecc1- [CI] Publish packageCompare with previous version
Eh?
copy_seatingplan_predicate = aand a few lines belowcopy_seatingplans_predicate = b?changed this line in version 7 of the diff
added 7 commits
master34a4354f- Merge branch 'master' into 2-add-integration-in-alsijila977b64b- Fix some permissions for use in Alsijild423655f- Reduce menu as there is just one menu item201c9a09- Merge branch '2-add-integration-in-alsijil' of...8dd17b56- Make code better readable and add docstringsCompare with previous version
resolved all threads
@hansegucker Please reply here.
Dev sprint decision: Seating plans for lessons without rooms are unsupported (actually, lessons without rooms are somewhat unsupported ;).
resolved all threads
mentioned in commit
e7c8963915